Blog Post 6 - Aggressive Mimicry
References
So far, I have
explored defensive mimicry in animals, specifically Batesian and Mullerian
mimicry. In this week’s post I will explore aggressive mimicry. As introduced
in my first blog, aggressive mimicry is a form
of mimicry in which predatory
organisms share/mimic similar signals to that of a harmless model, which allows
them to avoid being correctly identified by their prey or host (Jackson and
Cross, 2013). This form of mimicry can be compared to “a wolf in sheep’s
clothing” strategy. Aggressive mimicry has evolved to improve foraging success
(Glaudas and Alexander, 2017). It has been seen to involve various sensory
modalities such as visual, acoustic, chemical, and vibrational, and it usually
involves a single signal or variants of that signal (Glaudas and Alexander,
2017; Wignall and Taylor, 2010).
Communication plays a very important role in
this form of mimicry. Predators communicate with prey by making signals to indirectly
manipulate prey behaviour (Jackson and Cross, 2013). The manipulation of prey
by aggressive mimics is indirect. This is because the predators/signal senders
are not physically forcing prey/signal receivers to do something in particular,
but rather the sender
provides a specialized stimulus (i.e. a signal) to which the receiver responds
by doing something in particular, with this response being orchestrated by the
receiver's own perceptual and motor systems (Jackson and Cross, 2013). Communication
requires at least two individuals and a signal. One individual (the ‘sender’)
makes a signal to which the other individual (the ‘receiver’) responds in a way
that is beneficial to the sender (Jackson and Cross, 2013). Aggressive mimicry evolves if the receiver is fooled
into mistaking the mimic for the model and adjusts its behaviour in a way that
benefits the mimic (Dalziell and Welbergen, 2016). Secondary interactions have
been found to be important drivers of the evolutionary dynamics within aggressive
mimicry. By emphasizing manipulation techniques instead of just information
sharing, an aggressive mimic can gain access to resources rather than only receiving
protection from predators as seen in defensive mimicry (Ruxton et al. 2004).
Aggressive mimicry examples are abundant and diverse. They
range from flashing signals in Lampyrid beetles that attract and then consume
male fireflies by mimicking the flash behaviour of female fireflies, to the
sabre tooth blenny that poses a cleaner fish before ripping chunks of scales
and fin off harmless, trusting larger fish and then flees (Ruxton et al. 2004;
Sazima, 2002). Join me next week as I continue to explore aggressive mimicry in
an interesting example.
Dalziell,
A.H. and Welbergen, J.A., 2016. Mimicry for all modalities. Ecology letters,
19(6), pp.609-619.
Glaudas, X.
and Alexander, G.J., 2017. A lure at both ends: aggressive visual mimicry
signals and prey-specific luring behaviour in an ambush-foraging snake. Behavioral
ecology and sociobiology, 71(1), p.2.
Jackson, R.R. and Cross, F.R., 2013. A cognitive perspective on
aggressive mimicry. Journal of Zoology, 290(3), pp.161-171.
Ruxton,
G.D., Sherratt, T.N., Speed, M., 2004. Avoiding attack: the evolutionary
ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press. Retrieved
16 Apr. 2019, from
http://www.oxfordscholarship.com.elibrary.jcu.edu.au/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198528609.001.0001/acprof-9780198528609-chapter-13.
Sazima, I.,
2002. Juvenile snooks (Centropomidae) as mimics of mojarras (Gerreidae), with a
review of aggressive mimicry in fishes. Environmental Biology of Fishes,
65(1), pp.37-45.
Wignall,
A.E. and Taylor, P.W., 2010. Assassin bug uses aggressive mimicry to lure
spider prey. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1710),
pp.1427-1433.
Quite an interesting discussion today! I’m not sure that I fully understand how an angler fish’s lure is a form of aggressive mimicry. What is it mimicking?
ReplyDelete